After Action Report…
Please forgive my rambling if this gets to be all over the place. I am still medicated and haven’t had real food in two days. God I hate a stomach flu. Anyway…
So why did we lose and what can we do to get our shit together? The first part of that question is easiest to answer I think.
We lost because:
1. We had a candidate, though a good man, not well loved or even respected politically by his own party and outright disdained by the base. He is the poster child for how far the Republicans have strayed from the party’s core values.
2. Low turn out at the polls by conservatives.
John McCain and the GOP didn’t get their turnout in this race. They lost almost seven million voters from 2004, a rather stunning number. We’ll be chewing on this for a while, but that’s more than 10% of the Bush vote that got lost in this election. Did they stay home, or did significant numbers of them defect to Obama? I’m guessing the former. The GOP demoralized their base by acting like Democrats for too many years, and the winds of “change” proved too dispiriting this time around. via Ed Morrisey at Hot Air.
This was not an “Obama Republicans” win. This was 7 million conservative voters staying home. To many conservatives it is better to have a Democrat president than a fake Republican in office.
3. John McCain lost what chance he had to win this election when he signed the bailout instead of saying “I am going to make sure all these criminals who did this to our economy are going to be brought to justice.” Hell, no one has said that. Nancy Pelosi made it quite clear they will never be brought to justice.
4. John McCain wouldn’t play hardball and you have to in order to win. Politics are not civilized and you failed to point out your candidate was completely unqualified and a raging radical leftist. Seriously, if our party could not defeat this guy then we have problems much bigger than a single election.
5. With nearly a billion dollar war chest and a media ready to slaughter their first born to get Obama elected, we would have had to have Reagan to win.
What can we do to get our shit together?
1. We need to show the country how to lose gracefully. There hasn’t been a graceful loser in this country in recent memory. Gore and his inability to face reality changed the way we view elections in this country. Kerry, well, he is still out there bitching about Bush. We cannot afford to subscribe to Obama Derangement Syndrome. Our leaders in congress and the senate need to find their sack and remember who they are.
2. We need to get away from the idea that we are the party of God. All you evangelicals out there, God love ya, we respect you and want your vote, but the entire party is not made up of evangelicals nor can it be ruled by them. We didn’t get a Candidate Romney because of the evangelicals and I wonder how he would have done against the Senator from Illinois. I am not trying to piss folks off with this, honestly. I am just tired of the label that goes with being a Republican. I am not a member of the Christian Right. Hell most of the Christian Right thinks I am a heathen Catholic. UPDATE after Phone call with Bruce: I understand that it is the evangelicals that have kept this party alive for the last 20 years, I do not mean any disrespect to that. In fact I share pretty much every belief with the evangelicals, barring that whole I am Catholic and going to hell thing. What I mean is we cannot allow the media/left whatever to paint us into the corner of being open as a party to only evangelical and like minded people. The ruling issues of our party cannot be defining gay marriage or ending the practice of Abortion. The ruling issue of the party should be limiting government and our party has failed miserably at that in the last 8 years. The evangelicals came out and voted yesterday, it is the other conservatives who didn’t.
3. We were the party of limiting government and we have spent spent spent. Wtf is up with that? Earmarks have finally been made a point by McCain and may be his true legacy. Jeff Flake wrote a piece today, as Ed Morrissey puts it “A well deserved round of I told You So.”
The temptation for Republican members of Congress today will be to assume the role of the post-Watergate Republicans of 1974 and accept minority status as a permanent condition. Indeed, the terrain is more difficult for us now than it was in 1992. Then, Republicanism was still largely defined by the Reagan years. Today the party is defined in the public mind by the Bush presidency. We’ve got a steep hill to climb.Much of the backroom maneuvering and media speculation in the coming weeks will focus on identifying new standard-bearers for the party. This is important, and after a second straight drubbing, the House Republican leadership should be replaced. But the far more critical task is determining what standard these new leaders will bear.
I suggest that we return to first principles. At the top of that list has to be a recommitment to limited government. After eight years of profligate spending and soaring deficits, voters can be forgiven for not knowing that limited government has long been the first article of faith for Republicans.
Of course, it’s not the level of spending that gets the most attention; it’s the manner in which the spending is allocated. The proliferation of earmarks is largely a product of the Gingrich-DeLay years, and it’s no surprise that some of the most ardent practitioners were earmarked by the voters for retirement yesterday. Few Americans will take seriously Republican speeches on limited government if we Republicans can’t wean ourselves from this insidious practice. But if we can go clean, it will offer a stark contrast to the Democrats, who, after two years in training, already have their own earmark favor factory running at full tilt. Read the rest…
Every single earmark by every single Democrat in the legislative branch should be pointed out and our own guys need to knock that shit off. He points out a few good things at the end of his piece as well.
There are, of course, other pillars of the Republican standard—strong national defense, support for traditional values and the Second Amendment—but these are not areas where voters question Republican bona fides. In any event, as we have seen over the past several months, economic woes tend to subsume other concerns. We shouldn’t complain. We can now play our strongest hand.In some respects, raising a new standard was made easier by yesterday’s rout. The Republican Party is not bound by election-year promises made by its presidential nominee. More important, the party is finally untethered from the ill-fitting and unworkable big-government conservatism that defined the Bush administration.
This is not to say that it will be an easy transition. Congressional Republicans picked up some unattractive habits over the years in an effort to hold on to power. Whether it was relying on the redistricting process to help us choose our constituents, using the appropriations process as an ATM or passing legislation—such as a generous prescription drug benefit and a bloated farm bill—to pacify individual constituencies, these habits and voting patterns will be hard to break.
But there is reason for Republicans to feel optimism. Politically, America remains a center-right country, and America loves a chastened and repentant sinner. As surely as the sun rises in the east, the Democrats will overreach.
As long as we Republicans are willing to admit our folly, get back to first principles and work like there’s no tomorrow, we’ve got ‘em just where we want ‘em.
4. We need to realize the days of Old White Guys winning the presidency are over. The party needs new faces in leadership at every front. We need to stop trying to be Democrats Light.
5. We need to figure out a way to get the Hispanic vote and that is going to mean giving on immigration. It is going to happen anyway so why give the Left another minority to entitled into poverty?
6. To run anything other than a woman or a minority against Obama in 2012 is stupidity so get to looking for a few of each.
Beyond that I am not sure what happens to my party. I just know the answer does not lie with playing the game on their terms. I believe we are still a nation Right of Center and this election doesn’t change that fact. We observers of politics will have much to go on about over the next few years as our leftist counterparts try to find the balls to actually lead. They have no choice now. They control everything. No more Bush to blame. No more GOP control to blame. Who will they blame? Ultimately, Obama.
Stephen DeBeste has a good piece up about what the future holds.
And now they’re bound to be disappointed. Not even Jesus could satisfy all the expectations of Obama’s most vocal supporters, or fulfill all the promises Obama has made.I think Obama is going to turn out to be the worst president since Carter, and for the same reason: good intentions do not guarantee good results. Idealists often stub their toes on the wayward rocks of reality, and fall on their faces. And the world doesn’t respond to benign behavior benignly.
But there’s another reason why: Obama has been hiding his light under a basket. A lot of people bought a pig in a poke today, and now they’re going to find out what they bought. Obama isn’t what most of them think he is. The intoxication of the cult will wear off, leaving a monumental hangover.
And four years from now they’ll be older and much wiser.
A lot of bad things are going to happen during this term. But I don’t think that this is an irreversible catastrophe for the union. I’ve lived long enough to absorb this basic truth: the US is too large and too strong to destroy in just 4 years. Or even in 8. We survived 6 years of Nixon. We survived 4 years of Carter. We even survived 8 years of Clinton, God alone knows how.
The President of the United States is the most powerful political figure in the world, but as national executives go his powers are actually quite restricted. Obama will become President, but he won’t be dictator or king, let alone deity. He still has to work with the House and the Senate, and he still has to live within Constitutional restrictions, and with a judiciary that he mostly didn’t appoint.
The main reason this will be a “coming of age” moment is that now Obama and the Democrats have to put up or shut up. Obama got elected by making himself a blank slate, with vapid promises about “hope” and “change”—but now he actually has to do something. Now he has to reveal his true agenda. And with the Democrats also having a majority in both chambers of Congress, now the Democrats really have to lead. And they’re not going to do a very good job of it. It’s going to be amusing to watch.
And the people who fell for the demagoguery will learn an invaluable lesson.
Read the rest, it is a great.
The one good thing that should come from this election is the end of the Racist Nation bullshit. It was not black America who elected Barak Obama, there was only a slight increase in the number of black voters this time around. White America elected Barak Obama. They didn’t elect the privileged son of a black billionaire, they elected the bi-racial son of a middle class family.
I do not want to hear Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton talking about the Two Americas anymore. I do not want to hear about how adversity cannot be overcome by blacks in this country. Find another song to play guys, because if what you truly want is racial equity and if your dream truly is of an America where a young black man has the same chances as a white man then your work is done. I for one am glad to see it come to pass. Now the two of you can go find a real job and stop living off inciting racial hatred. That is so last century…

15 Responses so far
November 5th, 2008
5:28 pm
[...] After Action Report… | Demure Thoughts [...]
November 5th, 2008
10:24 pm
Right there with ya on getting shit together, especially on #2 and #5 since conservatives will be hard to breach on those. I think society is swinging more towards tolerance on those issues because people started to realize that they actually know some illegals and gay people. (Abortion’s a whole other ballgame.)
Note to social cons: gay marriage will not harm you. You can still tell your children that it’s wrong. Just hope they don’t turn out to be gay and resent you later.
November 6th, 2008
6:25 am
Really???? the gay issue is it huh. So because i know gay people it now is a none issue? When the conservatives start acting like social libs is the last day I will ever give to a campain or vote.
November 6th, 2008
7:02 am
The same Republican squishes who are now inaccurately claiming that social conservatism is the problem simultaneously cling to three of the most widely unpopular policies in politics today: the military occupations, the Wall Street bail-outs, and open migration. If the Frum faction remains influential in the Republican Party, they will ensure its return to the tiny minorities of the FRD era. Followership is not a functional strategy in any field of life, least of all national politics.
November 6th, 2008
8:18 am
We need to get back to our original ideas, i.e., smaller government, lower taxes. We NEED another Reagan to lead us back to the power.
November 6th, 2008
9:40 am
I heard Reagan’s “A Time to Choose” speech on AmericaRight radio last night and I remembered why I was so taken with him when I was in fifth grade and he ran against Jimmy Carter. My dad ran a Chamber of Commerce (or one of his many clubs) pancake supper where Ronald Reagan came to stump. I was in geeky political heaven. I even shook his hand and he touched my hair! (Okay, I have red hair and lots of people tend to touch my hair…) I was devastated when he didn’t get the nomination. By the way, have you looked at that electoral map? Remember when the south was blue states? Even TEXAS! Ack! If only he’d been running against Carter…
Really, is there another Republican that can hold a candle to Ronnie? Will we ever have that strong leadership again? A candidate that wipes the board in a landslide like 1980 with Dems and Republicans alike voting for them? A President that the world respects that can make them cower with a healthy dose of fear? I miss the 80’s…
The world is only excited about Obama because he’s as big a pussy as they all are.
November 6th, 2008
12:18 pm
I can’t agree with #5. The “hispanic vote” has many parts, from legal immigrants from Mexico to the ex-pat Cubans. I think they would support some law & order. Immigration is a big mess, and McCain was, yet again, against the base on this one. There has to be a solution somewhere between open borders and jackboots in the middle of the night.
Want to make a real change? Set the abortion thing aside. It’s been legal for 36 years, and it ain’t NEVER GONNA CHANGE. Give it up. Keep your opinions to yourselves, and when asked, say “this was decided in 1972”. Nothing but nothing frightens away the centrists more than that. You will never get Roe overturned, and if by some miracle you do then each state would have to vote … and each state would make it legal. Let it go. We lost. Get over it.
Ok, the Evangelical part scares the rest of us away too. Keep your faith, but keep it out of the party.
November 6th, 2008
5:20 pm
Well said, Drew.
As to getting the Hispanic vote, I just don’t know. I was doing research on minority and woman politicians to see who might be qualified to run in 2012 and who had “fire”. I found that to find an Hispanic Republican with good experience that was born in the US was kind of difficult. Then if you sifted out those that had already had the “touch of W” (or GHWB) the pickins were slim. I did read good things about Devin Nunes from California. He’s Portuguese. Do you get an Hispanic candidate to get the vote? Do you go soft on immigration? Being a Texan it is a big issue.
I also agree with Drew on the abortion issue. To me it has become a non-issue. I have never voted on that as an issue, however, Obama seems so gung ho to have abortion all over, all the time, up until the due date, for whomever wants it, I would have voted against him just on that issue. I have no problem with abortion being legal, I have a problem with it being legal to let a baby that is born alive die of suffocation because it wasn’t wanted. How any medical professional can condone that and participate in it just chills me to the bone.
November 6th, 2008
9:44 pm
“Really???? the gay issue is it huh. So because i know gay people it now is a none issue?”
No, not YOU of course. I said “society”. Not necessarily meaning every single person within that society. I would never stoop so low as to accuse you of being tolerant towards gay people. Also, I’m pretty sure most Americans favor open migration.
November 7th, 2008
5:13 am
Give up on abortion? I agree that Roe v. Wade will probably never be overturned but to make it so readily available to all women, young and middle-aged, naah!
I can remember some of the rhetoric leading up to Roe, like women having to seek out abortionists in back alleys, the use of wire hangers, etc. Abortion has now become a convenience, akin to plastic surgery.
What’s really funny is that Planned Parenthood’s founding savior, Marilyn Sanger, would today be described as a racist for her belief on aborting and sterilization of black women.
November 7th, 2008
4:28 pm
Wow thanks Joe, I was unaware that tolerant and apporving are the same thing. As for most Americans approve open immigration then I guess its ok. Most people used to be ok with slavery and keeping the black man down. Tomorrow if most people believe communism is cool I guess then you would be on board with that as well.
November 7th, 2008
5:29 pm
I hear you, Cowtipper, but there may have to be concessions to gain some ground. That doesn’t make those that consider this bad folks.
If the GOP’s stance on some issues has to be loosened to garner a majority of the vote in future elections, that might have to happen. Otherwise, we will continue to get Liberals elected into power. Sure, I want what we all want – true conservatism, but I’d prefer a Moderate Conservative to a Liberal or Socialist any day. Once the GOP up in power again, at least at the presidential level, then work can be done to get back to basics. The people have spoken – we’re not going to get back to true conservatism again overnight. UNLESS, there is a candidate that can capture the nation like Reagan did. Or like Obama did (okay, he didn’t take all but one state, but you know what I mean). Deviate from close held beliefs for the greater good of the party and the nation or stick to our moral guns and have virtually no representation as we have ended up.
Is this untenable? Not to me. I can sit alone with my high principles, but I’d rather give way on a few social issues to get my party back in power where they can do more good. Are women more open to compromise on these issues no matter their personal beliefs? Maybe. I know a lot of women switched to the “hopey, changey” camp this election (Holy Lord, my MIL, SIL and niece – sheesh). We need to get them back. We also need to get back some conservative leaning minorities that voted for Obama so that they could see a black man as President in their lifetime. Been there, done that – now let US give them someone to get behind.
Hot button issues will have to be felt out very carefully. Perhaps abortion is one to give up (within reason), maybe gay marriage is not. However, more people would probably have less problem (it’s no skin off my nose) approving civil unions as marriage in all but name only, as long as churches and ministers have the right to refuse them marriage in their church without fear of legal action. I have personal reasons to believe that being gay is not a choice (in most cases) or an abomination so don’t even…
It may even take until 2016 to make this happen. This kills me, as I don’t want my boys growing into men under this regime. So I am willing to allow my party to do what it takes to take back my country.
Anyone else agree?
November 7th, 2008
7:42 pm
But you didn’t say open immigration the first time, you said open migration. Nice try. But since you finally got your terms straight, I’d like to hear your plan on how we’re going to arrest and deport 12 million Mexicans, AND how we’re going to keep any more from ever getting in, AND how the positive effects will outweigh the detrimental effects.
And as far as gay people, all you have to do is ignore them. Tolerance is easy. Oppression takes work. I’m fully aware that “tolerate” and “approve” are different concepts. Apparently you’re not, because “legalize” and “approve” are different concepts as well. For example, I don’t approve of KKK websites, or Black Liberation Theology, or chocolate mint. But I would never outlaw any of them.
I’ll never be open to slavery or communism. I’m missing the gene that causes people to want to run other peoples’ lives. I’m glad to see you’re against keeping the black man down, though. Maybe there’s hope you’ll eventually feel the same about gays.
November 7th, 2008
7:45 pm
By the way, I lied, I really don’t care what your plan for Mexicans is. What I really want to know is why you think they should be condemned to a lifetime of poverty since they were born further to the south than you were.
I lied again. I don’t really want to know why you think that either.
November 7th, 2008
8:27 pm
Joe,
You are a shining example why Libertarians do not now nor ever will be elected to a postion above dogcatcher. Do you intend to allow in all Haitians, Ethiopians, amd people from East Timor? Because I would argue they live well below those from Mexico. I have been to both Haiti and Mexico, there is no comparison. How many is ok 20 million, 100 million or half the world?
Leave a comment